The Dynamic Capabilities of Cleantechs and Eco-Innovation in the Use of Green Fiscal Public Policies




Dynamic Capabilities, Eco - Innovation, Green Fiscal Public Policy , Cleantechs


Objective: This paper aims to present how Dynamic Capabilities can generate Eco-innovations to take advantage of Green Fiscal Public Policies in the context of Cleantechs.

Method: The methodological path taken included a multiple case study, in the context of 5 companies. The method approach was qualitative descriptive research with semi-structured interviews applied in the collection period from December (2021) to July (2022), including discourse analysis.

Results: The results demonstrate that Dynamic Capabilities are the preliminary basis for the development of Eco-innovations in Cleantechs. However, for these Eco-innovations to be able to exploit the social benefits of Green Fiscal Public Policies, it is fundamental that these Eco-innovations can generate green spillover effects (Green Spillovers), from economic benefits associated with the generation of jobs, reduction of impacts on the environment and infrastructure development.

Conclusions: The central contribution of the work demonstrates that dynamic capabilities provide innovative solutions balancing the stability of environmental, social, and economic resources in the process of taking advantage of green fiscal public policies, providing positive economic spillover effects to the economy such as increased quality of life, reduction of environmental impact, job creation and stimulus to the development of national infrastructure.

Author Biographies

Matheus Eurico Soares de Noronha, ESPM - Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing, São Paulo

PhD in Management and International Business at ESPM (Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing/Brazil). Master’s degree in Consumer Behavior at ESPM (ESPM/Brazil) and Bacharel in Marketing at Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (Mackenzie/Brazil). MBA at Católica Porto Business School (CPBS/Portugal). Professional experience in the renewable energy sector, specifically in the wind energy industry in the areas of communication, strategy, and innovation. Scientific Researcher in Innovation, strategy, and international business.

Juliano Barros Neves Martins, Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM), São Paulo

Master’s degree candidate in Administration at ESPM (Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing/Brazil) and Bacharel in Chemical Engineering at Universidade Santa Cecília (UNISANTA/Brazil). Professional experience in the renewable energy sector at technical and regulatory area in the wind energy industry. Scientific Research in Engineering, Economy and Strategy and International Business.

Priscilla Bidin da Silva, ESPM - Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing, São Paulo

Ph.D. candidate in Administration at ESPM, focusing on strategy and innovation research - completion year 2025. Working on the theory of Reverse Knowledge Transfer. Master of Administration (Consumer Behavior - MPCC at ESPM) Study produced on debt and consumer behavior with the theme debt from meanings and consumption patterns. Specialist in Administration at Fundação Getúlio Vargas (EPGE/FGV). Bachelor's in Business Administration from the University Nove de Julho. Researcher in the areas of Entrepreneurship, International Entrepreneurship, International Business, Innovation, and Sustainability, Consumerism, Consumer Behavior and Personal Finance.

Rosemeire de Souza Vieira Silva, ESPM Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing, São Paulo

PhD candidate in Management and International Business at ESPM (Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing/Brazil). Master in Consumer Behavior from ESPM (ESPM/Brazil) and bachelor’s in business administration from Faculdade Instituto Superior de Ensino Alvorada Plus (Adventista/Brazil). Professional experience in an educational institution and multinational company in planning, budgeting, and cost reduction. Scientific researcher in the line of strategy, innovation, and business.


Bierwisch, A., Huter, L., Pattermann, J., & Som, O. (2021). Taking Eco-Innovation to the Road—A Design-Based Workshop Concept for the Development of Eco-Innovative Business Models. Sustainability, 13(16), 8811. DOI:

Brink, T. (2019). Orchestration of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 13 (4) 960-976. DOI:

Bucci, M. P. D., & Souza, M. S. D. (2022). A abordagem Direito e políticas públicas: temas para uma agenda de pesquisa. Sequência (Florianópolis), 43(90), 1-27. DOI:

Coulthard, M., & Condlin, C. N. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis. Routledge. DOI:

Dalton, G., & Gallachóir, B. Ó. (2010). Building a wave energy policy focusing on innovation, manufacturing and deployment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(8), 2339-2358. DOI:

Dechezleprêtre, A., Martin, R., & Mohnen, M. (2014). Knowledge spillovers from clean and dirty technologies.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115. DOI:

Fekete, H., Kuramochi, T., Roelfsema, M., den Elzen, M., Forsell, N., Höhne, N., ... & Gusti, M. (2021). A review of successful climate change mitigation policies in major emitting economies and the potential of global replication. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137, 110602. DOI:

Fernando, Y., & Wah, W. X. (2017). The impact of eco-innovation drivers on environmental performance: Empirical results from the green technology sector in Malaysia. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 12, 27-43. DOI:

Fussler, C., & James, P. (1996). Driving eco-innovation: a breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability. Financial Times/Prentice Hall.

Garrido, I. L., Kretschmer, C., Vasconcellos, S. L. D., & Gonçalo, C. R. (2020). Capacidades Dinâmicas: Uma Proposta de Medição e sua Relação com o Desempenho. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 17, 46-65. DOI:

Gill, R. (2000). Discourse analysis. Qualitative researching with text, image, and sound, 1, 172-190. DOI:

Giudici, G., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2019). The creation of cleantech startups at the local level: the role of knowledge availability and environmental awareness. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 815-830. DOI:

Gramkow, C., & Anger-Kraavi, A. (2018). Could fiscal policies induce green innovation in developing countries? The case of Brazilian manufacturing sectors. Climate Policy, 18(2), 246-257. DOI:

Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study.

Hazarika, N., & Zhang, X. (2019). Evolving theories of eco-innovation: A systematic review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 19, 64-78. DOI:

Herman, K. S., & Xiang, J. (2020). Environmental regulatory spillovers, institutions, and clean technology innovation: A panel of 32 countries over 16 years. Energy Research & Social Science, 62, 101363. DOI:

Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., & Baptista-Lucio, P. (2006). Analisis de los datos cuantitativos. Metodología de la investigación, 407-499.

Horton, M., & El-Ganainy, A. (2012). Fiscal policy: taking and giving away. Finance and Development, International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from: https://www. imf. org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/fiscpol. htm.

Atlas TI (2018, agosto 20). Software de codificação e interpretação de coleta de dados.

Karjalainen, J., & Heinonen, S. (2018). The Pioneers of Renewable Energy are Around the World–What Can We Learn from Them?. Journal of Futures Studies, 22(4), 83-100.

Kemp, R., Arundel, A., Rammer, C., Miedzinski, M., Tapia, C., Barbieri, N., ... & McDowall, W. (2019). Measuring eco-innovation for a Green economy. Wirtsch Blätter, Special Issue on Nachhaltigkeit/Sustainability, 66(4), 391-404.

Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. Journal of cleaner production, 65, 57-75. DOI:

Klüber, T. E. (2014). Atlas/ti como instrumento de análise em pesquisa qualitativa de abordagem fenomenológica. ETD-Educação Temática Digital, 16(1), 5-23. DOI:

Kobarg, S., Stumpf-Wollersheim, J., Schlägel, C., & Welpe, I. M. (2020). Green together? The effects of companies’ innovation collaboration with different partner types on ecological process and product innovation. Industry and Innovation, 27(9), 953-990. DOI:

Lima, V. A., da Silva Costa, E., & da Silva Pereira, R. (2020). Inovação e sustentabilidade em pequenas empresas: um estudo com participantes do programa agentes locais de inovação em Rondônia (Brasil). REUNIR Revista de Administração Contabilidade e Sustentabilidade, 10(1), 43-54. DOI:

Long, S., & Liao, Z. (2021). Are fiscal policy incentives effective in stimulating firms’ eco‐product innovation? The moderating role of dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment. doi:10.1002/bse.2791. DOI:

Luo, Y. (2000). Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of world business, 35(4), 355-378. DOI:

Mäkitie, T., Andersen, A. D., Hanson, J., Normann, H. E., & Thune, T. M. (2018). Established sectors expediting clean technology industries? The Norwegian oil and gas sector's influence on offshore wind power. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 813-823. DOI:

Morton, S., Pencheon, D., & Squires, N. (2017). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and their implementationA national global framework for health, development and equity needs a systems approach at every level. British medical bulletin, 1-10. DOI:

Mosakowski, E., & McKelvey, B. (1997). Predicting rent generation in competence-based competition. Competence-based strategic management, 65, 65-85.

Noailly, J., & Shestalova, V. (2017). Knowledge spillovers from renewable energy technologies: Lessons from patent citations. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 22, 1-14. DOI:

Noronha, M. E. S., Ferraro, D. M., Longo, L. R., & Melvin, S. S. (2022). The orchestration of dynamic capabilities in cleantech companies. Innovation & Management Review.

Noronha, M. E. S., Martins, J. B. N., Lietti, T., & Silva, R. D. S. V. (2022) a. A agilidade organizacional e a difusão de inovação tecnológica das empresas cleantech. Revista Inteligência Competitiva, 12(1), e0412. DOI:

Noronha, M. E. S., Silva, R., Sauer, P. G., & da Silva, P. B. (2022) b. Economia da Informação na Indústria 4.0. Retail Management Review, 2(1), e17. DOI:

Oji, C., & Weber, O. (2017). Beyond the grid: Examining business models for delivering community-based REPs in developing countries.

Ottoboni, C., & Sugano, J. Y. (2009). Compreendendo a capacidade para inovar em empresas de base tecnológica (EBTs) a partir da abordagem capacidades dinâmicas. In Encontro da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, 33. Anais. Rio de Janeiro: Anpad.

Owusu, P. A., & Asumadu-Sarkodie, S. (2016). A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Eng 3: 1167990. DOI:

Pernick, R., & Wilder, C. (2007). The clean tech revolution: The next big growth and investment opportunity. Harper Collins.

Portman, M. E., Duff, J. A., Köppel, J., Reisert, J., & Higgins, M. E. (2009). Offshore wind energy development in the exclusive economic zone: Legal and policy supports and impediments in Germany and the US. Energy Policy, 37(9), 3596-3607. DOI:

Rangel-Martinez, D., Nigam, K. D. P., & Ricardez-Sandoval, L. A. (2021). Machine learning on sustainable energy: A review and outlook on renewable energy systems, catalysis, smart grid and energy storage. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 174, 414-441. DOI:

Shakeel, S. R. (2021). Cleantech: Prospects and Challenges. Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2), VIII-XVII. DOI:

Sica, E. (2016). Economic theories of eco-innovations: A comparison between the neoclassical and evolutionary approaches. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 10(1), 87-102. DOI:

Sikdar, S. (2022). A reflection based on personal experience and observation on the growth of the idea of sustainability. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 1-2. DOI:

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z DOI:<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Tomala, J., Mierzejewski, M., Urbaniec, M., & Martinez, S. (2021). Towards Sustainable Energy Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Energies, 14(19), 6037. DOI:

Tumelero, C., Sbragia, R., & Evans, S. (2019). Cooperation in R & D and eco-innovations: The role in companies' socioeconomic performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 1138-1149. DOI:

Türkeli, S., & Kemp, R. (2018). Changing patterns in eco-innovation research: A bibliometric analysis. In New developments in eco-innovation research (pp. 13-54). Springer, Cham. DOI:

Wilson, V. (2014). Research methods: triangulation. Evidence based library and information practice, 9(1), 74-75. DOI:

Yin, R. K. (2016). Pesquisa qualitativa do início ao fim. Penso Editora.

Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Journal Kemanusiaan 9(1):1-6.



How to Cite

Noronha, M. E. S. de ., Martins, J. B. N., Iamamoto, A. T. ., Bidin da Silva, P. ., & Vieira Silva, R. de S. (2023). The Dynamic Capabilities of Cleantechs and Eco-Innovation in the Use of Green Fiscal Public Policies. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(1), e0248.